Zum Inhalt springen

Projekt LoRaWAN: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Opennet
Inhalt gelöscht Inhalt hinzugefügt
Thm (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Thm (Diskussion | Beiträge)
Zeile 20: Zeile 20:
* Layer 2
* Layer 2


* Bi-directional end-devices (Class A): End-devices of Class A allow for biirectional communications whereby each end-device’s uplink transmission is followed by two short downlink receive windows. The transmission slot scheduled by the end-device is based on its own communication needs with a small variation based on a random time basis (ALOHA-type of protocol). This Class A operation is the lowest power end-device system for applications that only require downlink communication from the server shortly after the end-device has sent an uplink transmission. Downlink communications from the server at any other time will have to wait until the next scheduled uplink.
** Bi-directional end-devices (Class A): End-devices of Class A allow for biirectional communications whereby each end-device’s uplink transmission is followed by two short downlink receive windows. The transmission slot scheduled by the end-device is based on its own communication needs with a small variation based on a random time basis (ALOHA-type of protocol). This Class A operation is the lowest power end-device system for applications that only require downlink communication from the server shortly after the end-device has sent an uplink transmission. Downlink communications from the server at any other time will have to wait until the next scheduled uplink.
* Bi-directional end-devices with scheduled receive slots (Class B): End-devices of Class B allow for more receive slots. In addition to the Class A random receive windows, Class B devices open extra receive windows at scheduled times. In order for the End-device to open its receive window at the scheduled time, it receives a time synchronized Beacon from the gateway.
** Bi-directional end-devices with scheduled receive slots (Class B): End-devices of Class B allow for more receive slots. In addition to the Class A random receive windows, Class B devices open extra receive windows at scheduled times. In order for the End-device to open its receive window at the scheduled time, it receives a time synchronized Beacon from the gateway.
* Bi-directional end-devices with maximal receive slots (Class C): End-devices of Class C have nearly continuously open receive windows, only closed when transmitting. Class C end-device will use more power to operate than Class A or Class B but they offer the lowest latency for server to end-device communication.
** Bi-directional end-devices with maximal receive slots (Class C): End-devices of Class C have nearly continuously open receive windows, only closed when transmitting. Class C end-device will use more power to operate than Class A or Class B but they offer the lowest latency for server to end-device communication.


* Layer 3
* Layer 3

Version vom 14. März 2018, 09:05 Uhr

Knowledge LoRa / LoRa-WAN

Einsatzmöglichkeiten

Protokoll

LoRaWAN Klassen (ausLoRaWAN Backend Interfaces 1.0 Specification)
  • Layer 2
    • Bi-directional end-devices (Class A): End-devices of Class A allow for biirectional communications whereby each end-device’s uplink transmission is followed by two short downlink receive windows. The transmission slot scheduled by the end-device is based on its own communication needs with a small variation based on a random time basis (ALOHA-type of protocol). This Class A operation is the lowest power end-device system for applications that only require downlink communication from the server shortly after the end-device has sent an uplink transmission. Downlink communications from the server at any other time will have to wait until the next scheduled uplink.
    • Bi-directional end-devices with scheduled receive slots (Class B): End-devices of Class B allow for more receive slots. In addition to the Class A random receive windows, Class B devices open extra receive windows at scheduled times. In order for the End-device to open its receive window at the scheduled time, it receives a time synchronized Beacon from the gateway.
    • Bi-directional end-devices with maximal receive slots (Class C): End-devices of Class C have nearly continuously open receive windows, only closed when transmitting. Class C end-device will use more power to operate than Class A or Class B but they offer the lowest latency for server to end-device communication.
LoRaWAN Network Reference Model (NRM), roaming End-Device (aus LoRaWAN Backend Interfaces 1.0 Specification)

Hardware

Gateways

Mobilgeräte

Plan

Standorte

Bei 2km Reichweite in Städten würden wir mit den ersten drei Gateways schon die komplette Innenstadt abdecken.

Anbindung